<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IIS5.1 Directory Authentication Bypass by using &#8220;:$I30:$Index_Allocation&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/</link>
	<description>Soroush Dalili&#039;s blog - بلاگ سروش دلیلی</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>Fixed by MS10-065; CVE-2010-2731?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed by MS10-065; CVE-2010-2731?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soroush Dalili</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Soroush Dalili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 11:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>I answered all the comments through my email.
IIS&lt;=5.1 are still unpatched. In order to be secure, install URLScan on your web-server. It is not only possible to stop this attack by filtering &quot;:&quot; and &quot;$&quot; characters as there are some other unicode forms for these characters. Unfortunately, IIS5.1 supports illegal unicode form of characters as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered all the comments through my email.<br />
IIS<=5.1 are still unpatched. In order to be secure, install URLScan on your web-server. It is not only possible to stop this attack by filtering &#8220;:&#8221; and &#8220;$&#8221; characters as there are some other unicode forms for these characters. Unfortunately, IIS5.1 supports illegal unicode form of characters as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavlovconst</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4386</link>
		<dc:creator>pavlovconst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4386</guid>
		<description>it was very interesting to read soroush.secproject.com
I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
And you et an account on Twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was very interesting to read soroush.secproject.com<br />
I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?<br />
And you et an account on Twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek McUmber</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4355</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek McUmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4355</guid>
		<description>Using this method

&lt;location path=&quot;account&quot;&gt;
   &lt;system.web&gt;
     &lt;authorization&gt;
       &lt;deny users=&quot;?&quot;/&gt;
     &lt;/authorization&gt;
   &lt;/system.web&gt;
 &lt;/location&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using this method</p>
<p>&lt;location path=&#8221;account&#8221;&gt;<br />
   &lt;system.web&gt;<br />
     &lt;authorization&gt;<br />
       &lt;deny users=&#8221;?&#8221;/&gt;<br />
     &lt;/authorization&gt;<br />
   &lt;/system.web&gt;<br />
 &lt;/location&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek McUmber</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek McUmber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>This vulnerability does not appear to apply if there is .NET 1.1 or later installed and in use via aspx pages on the IIS 5.X instance.  Therefore, this vulnerability appears to be limited to .asp and the old style of windows web page development.  So far, all tests we have conducted give the proper 404 page not found response when using :$I30:$INDEX_ALLOCATION on directory folders listed as protected in Web.config using this method:

 
   
     
       
     
   
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This vulnerability does not appear to apply if there is .NET 1.1 or later installed and in use via aspx pages on the IIS 5.X instance.  Therefore, this vulnerability appears to be limited to .asp and the old style of windows web page development.  So far, all tests we have conducted give the proper 404 page not found response when using :$I30:$INDEX_ALLOCATION on directory folders listed as protected in Web.config using this method:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haha &#8211; IIS 5.1 Directory Authentication Bypass &#171; New World D0mber</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>Haha &#8211; IIS 5.1 Directory Authentication Bypass &#171; New World D0mber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>[...] 5.1 is quite old! More to read here or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5.1 is quite old! More to read here or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Internet Information Services Basic Authentication Security Bypass &#171; zencurity</title>
		<link>http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Internet Information Services Basic Authentication Security Bypass &#171; zencurity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/?p=263#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>[...] ORIGINAL ADVISORY: http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ORIGINAL ADVISORY: <a href="http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_.." rel="nofollow">http://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2010/07/iis5-1-directory-authentication-bypass-by-using-i30index_..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

